🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's parliament members have decided to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard women from violence, including domestic abuse, following prolonged and intense discussions in the parliament.

Thousands of demonstrators gathered in the capital this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now rests with Head of State the nation's president, who must decide whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Referred to as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring authorities to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial EU country to initiate the process of exiting from the convention. The transcontinental nation pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant regression for women's rights.

Political Debate and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative groups have contended that its focus on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, lawmakers decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action proposed by political opponents but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will continue fighting so that violence will not prevail," she stated to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary political groups advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose leader has called on the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent vote has sparked broad outcry both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a national petition calling for the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization the rights center has called a protest for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Worries and Possible Next Steps

The leader of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty choice driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the convention four years ago, instances of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not secure a supermajority majority, the head of state could potentially return the bill for additional consideration if he holds objections.

Head of State the national leader announced on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to constitutional requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another component of the governing alliance, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout Europe," commented a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse rates have been rising in several European countries
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular legal protections for victims of gender-based violence
• The nation's decision could influence similar debates in other member states